








|
|
Narrative
Table Summary
Narrative
The College will cultivate an organizational culture in which
policies, programs, practices, and personnel support learning
as the major priority.
Since the entire institution bears the responsibility of
becoming a learning college, the Enhancing Systems and Processes
Team met on January 21, 2003, to discuss how information could
be gathered from faculty and staff to improve systems and processes
with the goal of enhancing learning. The group decided to organize
informal forums to gather information from faculty and staff.
The ESP Team organized and facilitated these forums.
The forums were mandatory for all faculty and staff and were
held the week of February 4, 2003. Sessions were offered Monday
through Thursday afternoons 2:00 to 4:00. Opening remarks were
given by Dr. Steve Atkins to introduce the QEP and the Learning
Initiative; heterogeneous groups of four to six were formed
for informal brainstorming sessions.
Each small group was asked to offer strengths and challenges
in three major areas of the college: Processes, Programs, and
Policies. Participants were asked to think about how current
processes, programs, and policies hindered or enhanced learning.
Open-ended topics were suggested as cues in each area. After
this discussion, each group presented its list of strengths
and challenges to the group at-large.
The data was collected, organized, and distributed to members
of the ESP Team on February 26, 2003. The Team met in early
March to summarize the findings. Meeting regularly throughout
the spring semester, the Team analyzed the data and made its
official recommendations to CISL on June 5, 2003.
The ESP Team organized forum data into the following areas
of concern:
-
-
-
-
-
-
Placement Testing, Orientation, and Advising
-
-
-
-
-
Orientation/Mentoring of New Faculty
-
-
-
-
-
On June, 29, 2003, the CISL met to discuss the first two categories:
Discipline and Attendance. Throughout the fall, CISL continued
discussing the ESP recommendations, concluding at their October
meeting. CISL’s actions were presented to the College
in issues of The Exchange, November, 2003, through February,
2004.
As a result of CISL discussions, two sub-committees were formed
as part of the ESP Team: Calendar Committee and Sub-committee
on Cheating and Plagiarism. The Calendar Committee was asked
to develop an ideal academic calendar devoted to enhancing
student learning, and the Sub-committee on Cheating and Plagiarism
was asked to create a more comprehensive definition of cheating
and plagiarism as well as clearly outline faculty and student
responsibilities
Table Summary
| Expected
Outcomes |
SCC
Progress to Date |
| The College will conduct a thorough assessment of its
organizational culture and determine features that support
or hinder the move to become a more learning-centered
institution.
|
February, 2003: Faculty and staff forums
held to discuss processes, programs, and policies that
support
or hinder student learning.
March-June, 2003: ESP Team
analyzes data and reported recommendations to CISL.
June-October, 2003: CISL discusses
ESP recommendations; two sub-committees established.
November, 2003-February, 2004: ESP chair reports
results to the college via the QEP newsletter, The Exchange.
|
| College leaders, both academic and administrative,
will symbolically and substantively demonstrate support
of learning-centered initiatives. |
August 11, 2003: In a mandatory college-wide meeting,
Dr. Sells comments on the SCC Learning Initiative,
stating, “I believe the learning college journey
is the right thing to do—even without SACS to
push us.” In his remarks, Dr. Sells clearly affirms
his support for the Quality Enhancement Plan.
|
| The College will revise academic policies (e.g., late
registration, admission deadlines, attendance, probation,
and suspension) to reflect priorities placed on learning. |
In Progress:
Spring, 2003: Ad hoc committee is formed from
early ESP focus group results to focus on improving
advising and registration processes and policies. In
Summer, 2003, a new-student orientation is held with
strong faculty involvement. In 2004, the committee
continues its work on shaping a "first-year experience" program
for SCC, meeting with ASU representatives in February.
Fall, 2003: Calendar revisions that enhance
student learning are proposed: College-wide plagiarism
policy emphasizing student learning drafted.
November, 2003: Instructional Deans are asked
to investigate the use of “W,” “D,” and “I” on
attendance forms and final grade sheets.
February, 2004: Steering Committee on Attendance
is formed to investigate attendance policies and recommend
changes.
|
| The College will create decision-making structures
to ensure involvement of all key stakeholders. |
No action has been taken.
|
| The College will create plans and implement practices
to involve all appropriate stakeholders in facilitating
learning. |
October, 2003: Vice-President for Instruction presents
a QEP overview and shared progress to-date at a meeting
for College trustees.
February, 2004: Student representatives
attend their first SCC Roundtable.
February. 2004: Plans are underway for inviting
trustees to SCC Roundtables.
March, 2004: College faculty share critical
thinking projects in a poster session; the session
is followed by a faculty meeting in which business
leaders and a UNC representative explain the kind
of employees and transfer students they hire/accept.
College trustees, local media, and community college
administrators attend the meeetings.
|
| The College will revise the language in all appropriate
documents (e.g., mission statements, program descriptions,
job descriptions) to reflect the new emphasis on learning. |
Spring, 2003: Sections of the College Catalog are
revised to include references to the learning college
model and SCC’s Learning Initiative; approved
by Academic Council in April, 2003. See the following: “Learning
College Philosophy” on page 13, “General
Education Competency Requirements for All Degrees” on
pages 33-35, “Learning Communities” on
page 39.
Spring, 2004: Revisions of “Students’ Rights & Responsibilities” and “Cheating
and Plagiarism Policy” are revised for College
Catalog to reflect the learning college focus; are
presented to Academic Council. |
|
| |
| |
|
|